Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754022Ab2BORpN (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:45:13 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:59100 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751994Ab2BORpL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:45:11 -0500 Message-ID: <1329327902.2293.168.camel@twins> Subject: Re: sched: Performance of Trade workload running inside VM From: Peter Zijlstra To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: mingo@elte.hu, pjt@google.com, efault@gmx.de, venki@google.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Nikunj A. Dadhania" Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:45:02 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120215173817.GD9918@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20120214112827.GA22653@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1329307161.2293.66.camel@twins> <20120215171032.GB9918@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1329326651.2293.151.camel@twins> <20120215173817.GD9918@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1464 Lines: 35 On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 23:08 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > * Peter Zijlstra [2012-02-15 18:24:11]: > > > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:40 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > > > Ok ..let me see if these numbers highlight the problem better. > > > > does this translate like: I've no fscking clue, > > I'd mentioned a possible reason earlier which is limiting VM1 to reach higher > utilization (which is the time it waits for cpu after wakeup): > > >b. In the "all VMs active" case, VM1's vcpu tasks were found to incur > > "high" wait times when ttwo of VM1's tasks were scheduled on the same > > CPU (i.e a VCPU task had to wait behind a sibling VCPU task for > > obtaining CPU resource). > > Let me get cpu wait time data and post it by tomorrow. > > > but my tinker made it go away? > > Do you have any other suggestions for me to try? I'm still waiting for a problem description that isn't a book. What does the load-balancer do, why is it wrong, why does your patch sort it etc. I've really no idea what you're trying to do, other than make your numbers improve (which while a noble goal, doesn't help in judging your patch or suggesting alternative means of getting there). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/