Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 08:18:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 08:18:09 -0500 Received: from virtualro.ic.ro ([194.102.78.138]:53256 "EHLO virtualro.ic.ro") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 08:17:56 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 14:47:16 +0200 (EET) From: Jani Monoses To: viro@math.psu.edu cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: mark_inode_dirty question Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Al, I see that ( (inode->i_state & flags) != flags ) checked in __mark_inode_dirty as well as before it is called in mark_inode_dirty and mark_inode_dirty_sync .Could the i_state be changed during the call (on another CPU)? Thanks Jani. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/