Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756835Ab2BPB6K (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:58:10 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:62405 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756779Ab2BPB6I convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:58:08 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87k43nbsli.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <4F3B8EAE.4050809@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120215130240.7308f373.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <87k43nbsli.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:58:07 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map. From: Venki Pallipadi To: Rusty Russell Cc: Andrew Morton , "Srivatsa S. Bhat" , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel , KOSAKI Motohiro , Mike Travis , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Paul Gortmaker , Gilad Ben-Yossef Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-System-Of-Record: true Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2809 Lines: 58 On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:40 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530 >> "Srivatsa S. Bhat" wrote: >> >> > This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other >> > architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of >> > Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your >> > patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply >> > at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also >> > touches ia64). >> >> OK, I'm officially all confused. ?I think I'll drop everything and wait >> until it settles down. ?Please, someone prepare a single patch series. >> >> The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are: >> >> smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch >> #arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold >> arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch >> #tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold >> tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch >> slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch >> fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch >> mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch >> mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch >> mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch >> # >> arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch >> cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch >> >> So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two? > > Keep them all, I'll rebase on top of linux-next, and send you a few > patches. ?I'm not going to break down by arch, that was just in the hope > that the arch maintainers themselves would take them... > Rusty, Can you include cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch from akpm's list as last patch in your series and with Andrew dropping it. That will make sure things doesn't break in some intermediate state. Thanks, Venki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/