Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:04:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:04:05 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:49396 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:04:01 -0400 Subject: Re: Heavy Clock-Drift after update from Kernel 2.4.9 to 2.4.19 From: Alan Cox To: Matthias Schniedermeyer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 05 Aug 2002 23:26:23 +0100 Message-Id: <1028586383.18478.100.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 699 Lines: 18 On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 22:03, Matthias Schniedermeyer wrote: > A bit strange is that it seems to depend on load. Higher load seems to > cause less/none clock drift. > (e.g. when i compile something in background, the "rotating thing" in > mozilla doesn't spin to fast) > > Hardware is a Dual-PIII-933Mhz. Kernel is configured as SMP. > Any more details needed? Can you grab /proc/interrupts every 5 minutes for an hour and send me the resulting file ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/