Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:04:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:04:02 -0400 Received: from mta05ps.bigpond.com ([144.135.25.137]:27636 "EHLO mta05ps.bigpond.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:03:58 -0400 From: Brad Hards To: Greg KH Subject: Re: 2.4.19, USB_HID only works compiled in, not as module Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 07:02:22 +1000 User-Agent: KMail/1.4.5 Cc: Tyler Longren , kiza@gmx.net, LKML References: <20020805003427.7e7fc9f4.tyler@captainjack.com> <200208060001.07546.bhards@bigpond.net.au> <20020805165601.GA27503@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20020805165601.GA27503@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200208060702.29360.bhards@bigpond.net.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2211 Lines: 61 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 02:56, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 12:00:55AM +1000, Brad Hards wrote: > > Greg: I think this was one of your patches, associated with the > > HIDINPUT patch. It looks like the return value is wrong. See > > below. > > > > --- include/linux/hiddev.h.orig Mon Aug 5 23:19:54 2002 > > +++ include/linux/hiddev.h Mon Aug 5 23:56:34 2002 > > @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ > > int __init hiddev_init(void); > > void __exit hiddev_exit(void); > > #else > > -static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid) { return > > NULL; } +static inline void *hiddev_connect(struct hid_device *hid) { > > return -1; } static inline void hiddev_disconnect(struct hid_device *hid) > > { } static inline void hiddev_hid_event(struct hid_device *hid, unsigned > > int usage, int value) { } static inline int hiddev_init(void) { return 0; > > } > > ??? Why return -1 as a void *? > > The only caller of hiddev_connect is: > if (!hiddev_connect(hid)) > hid->claimed |= HID_CLAIMED_HIDDEV; > > Hm, seems like you don't want a void * there at all, but a int, right? I assume so. > But that doesn't explain the error people are having with the code > compiled in. No - while doing the investigation, I noted that dmesg was showing input0,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [045e:001d] on usb2:3.0 input1,hiddev0: USB HID v1.10 Pointer [045e:001d] on usb2:3.1 input2,hiddev0: USB HID v1.00 Mouse [Logitech USB-PS/2 Mouse M-BA47] on usb2:4.0 with CONFIG_USB_HIDDEV turned off. So I chased that down to the above conclusion. But I still don't see the problem, and can't duplicate it. Brad - -- http://conf.linux.org.au. 22-25Jan2003. Perth, Australia. Birds in Black. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9TufiW6pHgIdAuOMRAojFAKCmSOjjTwcp6z7tPKeR6kaokAF71wCginFW 5/94epXIyAJlfpFGtmQqxOY= =Ywrd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/