Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752396Ab2BPQtK (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:49:10 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:55808 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751178Ab2BPQtH (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:49:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:49:01 +0400 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Oleg Nesterov , Vasiliy Kulikov , Andrew Morton Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Pavel Emelyanov , Andrey Vagin , KOSAKI Motohiro , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Glauber Costa , Andi Kleen , Tejun Heo , Matt Helsley , Pekka Enberg , Eric Dumazet , Alexey Dobriyan , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Michal Marek , Frederic Weisbecker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: + syscalls-x86-add-__nr_kcmp-syscall-v8.patch added to -mm tree Message-ID: <20120216164901.GD3849@moon> References: <20120215175319.GG4533@moon> <20120215184336.GA24182@redhat.com> <20120215195610.GJ4533@moon> <20120215195733.GA8021@albatros> <20120215200533.GQ1894@moon> <20120215202538.GK4533@moon> <20120215210934.GL4533@moon> <20120215215807.GM4533@moon> <20120216144954.GA11953@redhat.com> <20120216151340.GI1905@moon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120216151340.GI1905@moon> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3750 Lines: 143 On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 07:13:40PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: ... > > > You could simply do > > int mutex_double_lock_killable(struct mutex *m1, struct mutex *m2) > > { > > int err; > > > > if (m2 > m1) > > swap(m1, m2); > > > > err = mutex_lock_killable(m1); > > > > if (!err && likely(m1 != m2)) { > > err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(m2); > > if (err) > > mutex_unlock(m1); > > } > > > > return err; > > } > > > > but I won't insist. > > Initially I wanted kcmp would be brining minimum impact > and if mutex is already taken by someone, we would not sleep > but return immediately with -EBUSY and it would be up to caller > to deside if to try again or make some delay first. I simply > not sure what is better here. > This one should do the trick. Cyrill --- From: Cyrill Gorcunov Subject: syscalls, x86: Make __NR_kcmp to work with equivalent pids In case if pid1 is equal to pid2 the kcmp will return -EBUSY, which makes no sence. Make it able to work with equivalent pids. Selftest is extended as well. Repored-by: Oleg Nesterov Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov --- diff -u linux-2.6.git/kernel/kcmp.c linux-2.6.git/kernel/kcmp.c --- linux-2.6.git/kernel/kcmp.c +++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/kcmp.c @@ -58,22 +58,31 @@ return file; } -static void access_unlock(struct task_struct *task) +static void kcmp_unlock(struct mutex *m1, struct mutex *m2) { - mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex); + if (m2 > m1) + swap(m1, m2); + + if (likely(m2 != m1)) + mutex_unlock(m2); + mutex_unlock(m1); } -static int access_trylock(struct task_struct *task) +static int kcmp_lock(struct mutex *m1, struct mutex *m2) { - if (!mutex_trylock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex)) - return -EBUSY; + int err; + + if (m2 > m1) + swap(m1, m2); - if (!ptrace_may_access(task, PTRACE_MODE_READ)) { - mutex_unlock(&task->signal->cred_guard_mutex); - return -EPERM; + err = mutex_lock_killable(m1); + if (!err && likely(m1 != m2)) { + err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(m2, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); + if (err) + mutex_unlock(m1); } - return 0; + return err; } SYSCALL_DEFINE5(kcmp, pid_t, pid1, pid_t, pid2, int, type, @@ -100,12 +109,15 @@ /* * One should have enough rights to inspect task details. */ - ret = access_trylock(task1); + ret = kcmp_lock(&task1->signal->cred_guard_mutex, + &task2->signal->cred_guard_mutex); if (ret) goto err; - ret = access_trylock(task2); - if (ret) + if (!ptrace_may_access(task1, PTRACE_MODE_READ) || + !ptrace_may_access(task2, PTRACE_MODE_READ)) { + ret = -EPERM; goto err_unlock; + } switch (type) { case KCMP_FILE: { @@ -149,9 +161,9 @@ break; } - access_unlock(task2); err_unlock: - access_unlock(task1); + kcmp_unlock(&task1->signal->cred_guard_mutex, + &task2->signal->cred_guard_mutex); err: put_task_struct(task1); put_task_struct(task2); diff -u linux-2.6.git/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c linux-2.6.git/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c --- linux-2.6.git/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c +++ linux-2.6.git/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/kcmp_test.c @@ -74,6 +74,15 @@ ret = -1; } else printf("PASS: 0 returned as expected\n"); + + /* Compare with self */ + ret = sys_kcmp(pid1, pid1, KCMP_VM, 0, 0); + if (ret) { + printf("FAIL: 0 expected but %li returned\n", ret); + ret = -1; + } else + printf("PASS: 0 returned as expected\n"); + exit(ret); } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/