Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:01:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:01:05 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:57333 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 5 Aug 2002 19:01:05 -0400 Subject: Re: Oopses From: Alan Cox To: Gregory Stark Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <87sn1sgbcp.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> References: <87sn1sgbcp.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 06 Aug 2002 01:23:31 +0100 Message-Id: <1028593411.18130.131.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 882 Lines: 20 On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 00:00, Gregory Stark wrote: > > I received these two oopses recently running 2.4.17. Is this a known bug? > Is it fixed in 2.4.18? > > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address e0f390e8 > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: printing eip: > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: c0140cfc > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: *pde = 00000000 > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: Oops: 0002 > Aug 5 17:43:07 stark kernel: CPU: 0 > Aug 5 17:43:08 stark kernel: EIP: 0010:[get_empty_inode+44/160] Tainted: PF What binary modules are you running, and what did you use insmod -f on ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/