Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756292Ab2BQBML (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:12:11 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:46113 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754860Ab2BQBMJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:12:09 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208";a="108972769" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/6] ACPI: Reference devices in ACPI Power Resource From: Lin Ming To: Alan Stern Cc: Zhang Rui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Jeff Garzik , Tejun Heo , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:12:06 +0800 Message-ID: <1329441126.3376.30.camel@minggr> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2647 Lines: 81 On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 10:13 -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Zhang Rui wrote: > > > > I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to achieve and what you mean by > > > "resume a device directly"? Do you want to run the device's resume > > > callback at the time when another device is being resumed? > > > > > I mean, wakeup event is sent to ATA port, but our goal is to resume > > ZPODD after receiving this wakeup event. > > Ideally, it is ACPI that resumes ATA port. And then, the ATA port > > runtime resumes ZPODD. But this does not look good to runtime resume a > > child device in the parent's .runtime_resume callback. > > So I introduced these two APIs so that an runtime_resume request can be > > sent to ZPODD directly and the runtime PM core can resume all the > > parents of ZPODD automatically. > > It's not clear what you're trying to achieve. Do you basically want > the ZPODD always to be suspended and resumed along with the ATA port, > or should it be possible to suspend the ZPODD while the port remains > running? We want to ZPODD always to be suspended and resumed along with the ATA port. Below is part of the GPE handler for ZPODD device attention event. Scope (\_GPE) { Method (_L13, 0, NotSerialized) { ADBG ("ZPODD DA Event") .... Notify (\_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2, 0x02) .... } } It maybe a bit confused, but actually, \_SB.PCI0.SAT0.PRT2 is bind to the attached device, not the ata port itself. See below commit in linux-next tree. 75d22c(libata: Bind the Linux device tree to the ACPI device tree) And below notify handler(PATCH 6) will resume the attached device(CDROM in ZPODD case). +static void ata_acpi_wake_dev(acpi_handle handle, u32 event, void *context) +{ + struct ata_device *ata_dev = context; + + if (event == ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE && ata_dev) + scsi_autopm_get_device(ata_dev->sdev); +} + But the code to power on/power off the device is in ata_acpi_set_state, which is called when ata port is resumed/suspended. ata_eh_handle_port_resume/suspend ata_acpi_set_state ata_for_each_dev { acpi_bus_set_power(, acpi_state) } Could you take a look at PATCH 6? It's more clear over there. Thanks, Lin Ming > > Alan Stern > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/