Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:41:03 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>, axboe@kernel.dk,
        ctalbott@google.com, rni@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] block: implement bio_associate_current()
Message-ID: <20120217224103.GN29414@google.com>
References: <1329431878-28300-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
 <1329431878-28300-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org>
 <20120217011907.GA15073@google.com>
 <20120217221406.GJ29414@google.com>
 <20120217223420.GJ26620@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120217223420.GJ26620@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 808
Lines: 20

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 05:34:20PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Nope. We make note of task migration and drop cic->cfqq association
> and establish a new association where new cfqq is part of new cgroup.
> (ioc_cgroup_changed()).

Yeah, that's the CHANGED bit thing.  I probably got confused with
blk-throttle losing blkcg while testing.  Anyways, it would be great
if we can either remove that altogether.  e.g. compare the cached
blkg->blkcg and see if it has changed from cfq.  Or add a callback and
do the shootdown synchronously at least.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/