Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:36:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:36:10 -0400 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:17679 "EHLO www.home.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:36:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:39:43 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas Mierau Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19-ac4 IRQ messup? Message-ID: <20020806083943.GA32229@alpha.home.local> References: <1028586383.18478.100.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <200208061014.13619.tmi@wikon.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208061014.13619.tmi@wikon.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2372 Lines: 44 On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 10:14:30AM +0200, Thomas Mierau wrote: > the ping on eth0 > The blocks of 5 return at the same time , as the time differnce is always > 1sec off look pretty nasty I think you get intreface resets. I had such a problem with a 3c575CB (same driver), connected to a defective chipset. I couldn't send high traffic rates, but could receive. There is a watchdog timeout that you can reconfigure in the 3c59x driver (I don't remember its name, use modinfo). If you reduce the timeout, you should see reduced drifting in the pings. I used 300ms I think. But IMHO, that's definitely not a timing problem. Perhaps in your case, it's simply a half/full duplex misconfiguration. Regards, Willy > PING 192.168.47.47 (192.168.47.47) from 192.168.47.11 eth0: 56(84) bytes of > data. > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=4912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=3 ttl=255 time=3912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=4 ttl=255 time=2912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=5 ttl=255 time=1912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=6 ttl=255 time=912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=7 ttl=255 time=4905 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=8 ttl=255 time=3905 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=9 ttl=255 time=2905 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=10 ttl=255 time=1905 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=11 ttl=255 time=905 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=12 ttl=255 time=4912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=13 ttl=255 time=3911 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=14 ttl=255 time=2912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=15 ttl=255 time=1912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=16 ttl=255 time=912 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=17 ttl=255 time=4902 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=18 ttl=255 time=3902 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=19 ttl=255 time=2902 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=20 ttl=255 time=1902 ms > 64 bytes from 192.168.47.47: icmp_seq=21 ttl=255 time=902 ms - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/