Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:45:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:45:19 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:54702 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 04:45:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 10:48:51 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Bill Davidsen , lkml Subject: Re: Linux v2.4.19-rc5 Message-ID: <20020806084851.GC1164@suse.de> References: <20020806054258.GJ3975@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 948 Lines: 28 On Tue, Aug 06 2002, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > > >... > > try a work load that excercises the block i/o layer alone (O_DIRECT, > > raw, whatnot) and then compare 2.4 and 2.5. ibm had some slides on this > > from ols, unfortunately I don't know if they have then online. > >... > > Pages 390-406 in > > http://www.linux.org.uk/~ajh/ols2002_proceedings.pdf.gz > > or are you talking about something different? Right thanks, exactly those. Table 3 on page 395 is the one I noted. Forget readv, as that hasn't been done in 2.5 yet. I'd say a 2.5.17 untweaked kernel beating 2.4 tweaked beyond recognition isn't too shabby for a devel series kernel. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/