Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 05:57:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 05:57:26 -0400 Received: from willy.net1.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:19215 "EHLO www.home.local") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 05:57:25 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 12:01:01 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Thomas Mierau Cc: Willy Tarreau , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.4.19-ac4 IRQ messup? Message-ID: <20020806100101.GA20758@alpha.home.local> References: <200208061014.13619.tmi@wikon.de> <20020806083943.GA32229@alpha.home.local> <200208061139.35323.tmi@wikon.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208061139.35323.tmi@wikon.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 955 Lines: 25 On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:39:43AM +0200, Thomas Mierau wrote: > Thanks, > I looked it up its called watchdog (what else). It was set to 5000ms and I > changed it to 300ms. But the result is : no change! by "no change", you mean "still loss of 5s" ? If this is the case, are you sure the switch port you are connected to is in full duplex too ? does it detect receive errors or carrier lost ? I believe that cisco switches in "spanning tree portfast" mode block the port during 5s after a renegociation. It's easy to detect because the port's led becomes orange. perhaps you can switch the 2 NIC's cables to check if the problem follows the cable or the NIC. else I have no other clue ... Regards, Willy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/