Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 10:39:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 10:39:45 -0500 Received: from diver.doc.ic.ac.uk ([146.169.1.47]:56846 "EHLO diver.doc.ic.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 10:39:26 -0500 To: Rob Landley Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun? From: David Wragg In-Reply-To: <20001215192335.20019.qmail@web5203.mail.yahoo.com> Date: 16 Dec 2000 15:08:56 +0000 Message-ID: Lines: 19 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Rob Landley writes: > Remember, Linux uses > Posix (although we don't SAY posix much because that's > another trademark and nobody jumps through the hoops > to re-test each new conbination of kernel version X > with utility set Y). POSIX is not a trademark. The name refers to an IEEE/ISO/IEC standard. You don't *have* to run any tests to claim that Linux (+ libc + utilities) conforms to POSIX. But if you don't run a suitable test suite, how can you be confident that it does conform to POSIX? (The origin of the term POSIX may be a surprise to some. See ). David Wragg - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/