Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 06:46:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 06:46:22 -0400 Received: from e1.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.101]:15013 "EHLO e1.ny.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 06:46:20 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:29:47 +0530 From: "Vamsi Krishna S ." To: Christoph Hellwig , Rusty Russell , Linus Torvalds , "David S. Miller" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vamsi_krishna@in.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] kprobes for 2.5.30 Message-ID: <20020806162947.A22164@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vamsi@in.ibm.com References: <20020806073804.690DE4BA4@lists.samba.org> <20020806085918.A13396@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020806085918.A13396@infradead.org>; from hch@infradead.org on Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 08:59:18AM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 849 Lines: 22 On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 08:59:18AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 05:22:15PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Vamsi, what do you think of this patch? Is it neccessary to restore > > interrupts before handle_vm86_trap (the original patch didn't do this > > either, not sure if it's required). > > Any chance you could split the i386-specific kprobes code into > arch/i386/kernel/kprobes.c instead of bloating traps.c? Agreed. Please see the latest patch. -- Vamsi Krishna S. Linux Technology Center, IBM Software Lab, Bangalore. Ph: +91 80 5044959 Internet: vamsi@in.ibm.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/