Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754644Ab2BTWcN (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:32:13 -0500 Received: from smtp2.it.da.ut.ee ([193.40.5.67]:59386 "EHLO smtp2.it.da.ut.ee" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754287Ab2BTWcM (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Feb 2012 17:32:12 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 00:32:09 +0200 (EET) From: Meelis Roos To: Tejun Heo cc: Grant Likely , Rob Herring , sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel list , sam@ravnborg.org Subject: Re: OF-related boot crash in 3.3.0-rc3-00188-g3ec1e88 In-Reply-To: <20120220170603.GC7836@mtj.dyndns.org> Message-ID: References: <20120213080618.GA11077@ponder.secretlab.ca> <20120213214623.GJ11077@ponder.secretlab.ca> <20120220170603.GC7836@mtj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.00 (SOC 882 2007-12-20) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1883 Lines: 42 > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 11:11:05AM +0200, Meelis Roos wrote: > > Finished bisecting on the other machine too (Sun Fire V100 where strlen > > crashes): > > > > 7bd0b0f0da3b1ec11cbcc798eb0ef747a1184077 is the first bad commit > > commit 7bd0b0f0da3b1ec11cbcc798eb0ef747a1184077 > > Author: Tejun Heo > > Date: Thu Dec 8 10:22:09 2011 -0800 > > > > memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator > > > > Now that all early memory information is in memblock when enabled, we > > can implement reverse free area iterator and use it to implement NUMA > > aware allocator which is then wrapped for simpler variants instead of > > the confusing and inefficient mending of information in separate NUMA > > aware allocator. > > > > Implement for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(), use it to reimplement > > memblock_find_in_range_node() which in turn is used by all allocators. > > > > The visible allocator interface is inconsistent and can probably use > > some cleanup too. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt > > Cc: Yinghai Lu > > Hmmm.... So, different bisection results from two machines? That's a > bit weird. I *think* this bisection result makes more sense. Can you > please verify the bisection result on e2500 once more? You were right. The first machine now bisects down to the same commit - I was confused by "0 revisions to test" and did not run the last step whe first bisecting. -- Meelis Roos (mroos@linux.ee) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/