Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753614Ab2BUJVk (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:21:40 -0500 Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]:38766 "HELO mailout-de.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753047Ab2BUJVi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:21:38 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19YG29FfwhYF/xcMcuJ7INdbe8Nixyz3sTsM4xj2y JtpWIkpQBESFYW Message-ID: <1329816093.7333.49.camel@marge.simpson.net> Subject: Re: sched: Avoid SMT siblings in select_idle_sibling() if possible From: Mike Galbraith To: Srivatsa Vaddagiri Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Suresh Siddha , linux-kernel , Ingo Molnar , Paul Turner Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:21:33 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20120221083241.GC5156@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1321495153.5100.7.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321544313.6308.25.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321545376.2495.1.camel@laptop> <1321547917.6308.48.camel@marge.simson.net> <1321551381.15339.21.camel@sbsiddha-desk.sc.intel.com> <1321629267.7080.13.camel@marge.simson.net> <1329748861.2293.345.camel@twins> <1329761661.6276.146.camel@marge.simpson.net> <1329764866.2293.376.camel@twins> <1329802998.7333.1.camel@marge.simpson.net> <20120221083241.GC5156@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1502 Lines: 37 On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 14:02 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > * Mike Galbraith [2012-02-21 06:43:18]: > > > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 20:07 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > > On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 19:14 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > Enabling SD_BALANCE_WAKE used to be decidedly too expensive to consider. > > > > Maybe that has changed, but I doubt it. > > > > > > Right, I through I remembered some such, you could see it on wakeup > > > heavy things like pipe-bench and that java msg passing thing, right? > > > > Yeah, it beat up switch heavy buddies pretty bad. > > Do you have pointer to the java benchmark? Also is pipe-bench the same > as the one described below? I use vmark, find it _somewhat_ useful. Not a lovely benchmark, but it is highly affinity sensitive, and switches heftily. I don't put much value on it though, too extreme for me, but it is a ~decent indicator. There are no doubt _lots_ better than vmark for java stuff. I toss a variety pack at the box in obsessive-compulsive man mode when testing. Which benchmarks doesn't matter much, just need to be wide spectrum and consistent. > http://freecode.com/projects/pipebench No, I use Ingo's pipe-test, but that to measure fastpath overhead. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/