Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754177Ab2BUKRl (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 05:17:41 -0500 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:35676 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752285Ab2BUKRj convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2012 05:17:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1329819437.2293.382.camel@twins> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 x86] fix some page faults in nmi if kmemcheck is enabled From: Peter Zijlstra To: Li Zhong Cc: LKML , tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, mingo@elte.hu, acme@ghostprotocols.net Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 11:17:17 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1329788560.3448.45.camel@ThinkPad-T61> References: <1329717665.3448.28.camel@ThinkPad-T61> <1329735648.2293.307.camel@twins> <1329788560.3448.45.camel@ThinkPad-T61> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1478 Lines: 38 On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 09:42 +0800, Li Zhong wrote: > > Hell no, these are some of the ugliest patches I've seen in a while. Not > > to mention that their changelogs are utter crap since they don't even > > explain why they're doing what they're doing. > > > Hi Peter, > > I agree that the fix is ugly. I'm willing to change if there are some > better ways. There are always better ways.. > The problem here is: > 1. It seems x86 doesn't allow page faults in nmi, and there are checks > in the code, like WARN_ON_ONCE(in_nmi()). I bet that's not x86 only.. > 2. If CONFIG_KMEMCHECK is enabled, the pages allocated through slab will > be marked as non-present, to capture uninitialized memory access. More > information in Documentation/kmemcheck.txt . So then kmemcheck is buggy, since the nmiaction structure is initialized in register_nmi_handler(), so it should most definitely not be marked non-present. > 3. From the log, there are some memories accessed in nmi, which are in > pages marked as non-present by kmemcheck, as they are allocated by > something like kmalloc(). So figure out why and fix that instead of writing ugly ass patches that seemingly work around the problem without actually thinking about it. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/