Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:18:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:18:47 -0400 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:31752 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:18:46 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:31:56 -0300 (BRT) From: Marcelo Tosatti X-X-Sender: marcelo@freak.distro.conectiva To: jt@hpl.hp.com Cc: Linux kernel mailing list , Alan Cox Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.20-pre1 In-Reply-To: <20020806171736.GC11313@bougret.hpl.hp.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2089 Lines: 53 On Tue, 6 Aug 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 09:33:45AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2002, Jean Tourrilhes wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Sorry to disturb, but it seems that kernel.org didn't pick up > > > 2.4.20-pre1 (or I'm looking at the wrong places). > > > > > > I'm asking because I've just finished testing my IrDA update > > > for 2.4.20, and you've just included some useless IrDA change that > > > probably render my patch worthless > > > > What you mean I included some useless IrDA patch? > > Yep, tons of these : > ----------------------------------------------- > - IRDA_DEBUG(4, __FUNCTION__ "(), speed=%d (was %d)\n", speed, > - self->speed); > + IRDA_DEBUG(4, "%s(), speed=%d (was %d)\n", __FUNCTION__, > + speed, self->speed); > ----------------------------------------------- > Between this and fixing a Oops or Deadlock, I'll take the > second any day. > I don't care on those patch in general, I'm not a control > freak, except that being so pervasive they are guaranteed to screw up > my own patches. That's why yesterday I *explicitely* asked you and > Alan if anything was pending, so that I could avoid wasting my time > and instead wait for the next release doing something else. > I guess it's too late, I already wasted my afternoon. > > The second thing that bugs me is that because those patches > pass behind my back, they won't get applied to *both* 2.4.X and > 2.5.X. Because of that, keeping 2.4.X and 2.5.X in synch is an > exercise in futility. > But maybe you are finding that there is already too many IrDA > maintainers. > > I'll send you the Wireless patches, and I'll try to respin the > IrDA patches this afternoon (i.e. please screw me again !). I can back out those patches if you want. Will that help you? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/