Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:43:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:43:15 -0400 Received: from air-2.osdl.org ([65.172.181.6]:57352 "EHLO mail.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 16:43:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 13:42:20 -0700 (PDT) From: "Randy.Dunlap" X-X-Sender: To: Alan Cox cc: , Chris Friesen , , Subject: Re: ethtool documentation In-Reply-To: <1028671126.18478.190.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 981 Lines: 28 On 6 Aug 2002, Alan Cox wrote: | On Tue, 2002-08-06 at 21:03, Richard B. Johnson wrote: | > Sure you can. And it was assumed that the MAC address provided by | > the manufacturer would always be used by the software for the MAC | > address on the wire. However, 'software engineers' have decided | | Umm no | | DECnet used dynamically assigned MAC addresses from the beginning and | Digital (now Compaq (now HP)) were one of the creators of the original | DIX ethernet standard | | Thats why several boards allow you to have a pair of receiving MAC | addresses. Do you mean several unicast MAC addresses, as opposed to broadcast + several multicast + (one) unicast MAC address? If so, I'm not familiar with that scenario. -- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/