Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754929Ab2BWQrM (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:47:12 -0500 Received: from hqemgate03.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.140]:9379 "EHLO hqemgate03.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752177Ab2BWQrL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:47:11 -0500 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqnvupgp05.nvidia.com on Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:46:53 -0800 From: Stephen Warren To: Linus Walleij CC: Linus Walleij , "B29396@freescale.com" , "s.hauer@pengutronix.de" , "dongas86@gmail.com" , "shawn.guo@linaro.org" , "thomas.abraham@linaro.org" , "tony@atomide.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 08:46:51 -0800 Subject: RE: [PATCH 19/20] pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device Thread-Topic: [PATCH 19/20] pinctrl: API changes to support multiple states per device Thread-Index: Aczx76csBTc0kLyTR4yD0WY6xflXtwAWqTeQ Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF17BD8BC976@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com> References: <1329720360-23227-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> <1329720360-23227-20-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1104 Lines: 28 Linus Walleij wrote at Wednesday, February 22, 2012 10:55 PM: > On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 7:45 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: ... > This is looking real good. I think recent discussion with Russell > also ironed out the problems with potential gpio interaction. Hmm. I guess I need to go re-read that then; my impression was that we hadn't really reached a solid conclusion yet. ... > Please move this patch as far to the head of the series as possible > so we can get it in, I guess you need the state lookup in struct pinctrl > to proceed but could we e.g. puy the locking changes after this? The main reason I wrote the patches like the locking patch was due to issues I found when working on these two main patches. I'm not sure that these later patches would work completely correctly without the locking rework first... -- nvpublic -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/