Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:08:29 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:08:29 -0400 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:2459 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:08:27 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 11:07:52 +1000 From: Anton Blanchard To: Andrew Morton Cc: William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com Subject: Re: fix CONFIG_HIGHPTE Message-ID: <20020807010752.GC6343@krispykreme> References: <20020806231522.GJ6256@holomorphy.com> <3D506D43.890EA215@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D506D43.890EA215@zip.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 763 Lines: 20 > We're piling more and more crap in there to support these pte_chains. > How much is too much? > > Is it likely that large pages and/or shared pagetables would allow us to > place pagetables and pte_chains in the direct-mapped region, avoid all > this? On ppc64 shared pagetables will require significant changes to the way we handle the hardware hashtable. So add that to the "more and more crap in there to support these pte_chains" Will shared pagetables be a requirement or can we turn it on per arch? Anton - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/