Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:52:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:52:58 -0400 Received: from ool-182fa350.dyn.optonline.net ([24.47.163.80]:58497 "EHLO nikolas.hn.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:52:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 23:56:23 -0400 From: Nick Orlov To: Bill Davidsen Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] pdc20265 problem. Message-ID: <20020807035623.GA3411@nikolas.hn.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bill Davidsen , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml References: <20020806043304.GA8272@nikolas.hn.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 968 Lines: 30 On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 11:09:14PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > 2. on most hardware, pdc20xxx is really additional controller. > > That's the problem, most not all. No matter what we assume it will be > wrong part of the time. Agreed. > > > 3. if we put pdc20265 in "onboard" list on some hardware (mine for example) > > pdc20265 is assigned to ide0/1 (even if it's really ide2/3) > > Does this matter as long as we can force it to be where we want? But wouldn't it be a cleaner solution if we will have _compile_ time option that by default is turned on in order to handle rare cases, and _can_ be turned off in order to handle _most_ cases without any boot-time options? -- With best wishes, Nick Orlov. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/