Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753041Ab2B0IU3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:20:29 -0500 Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com ([209.85.215.46]:57292 "EHLO mail-lpp01m010-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752729Ab2B0IU0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 03:20:26 -0500 Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of javier.martin@vista-silicon.com designates 10.152.132.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=javier.martin@vista-silicon.com MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1329916892.24656.110.camel@vkoul-udesk3> References: <1328884300-18801-1-git-send-email-javier.martin@vista-silicon.com> <1329916892.24656.110.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:20:24 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] dmaengine: i.MX DMA series. From: javier Martin To: Vinod Koul Cc: Sascha Hauer , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, dan.j.williams@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1798 Lines: 46 Hi Vinod, On 22 February 2012 14:21, Vinod Koul wrote: > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 12:51 +0100, javier Martin wrote: >> On 10 February 2012 15:31, Javier Martin >> wrote: >> > Patches 1-3 have already been sent to the list (not merged yet) >> > but they are submitted so that everyone can get the whole picture >> > of what we're trying to do here. >> > >> > A new patch(4) has been added which adds support for multiple >> > descriptors. >> > >> > [PATCH 1/4] dmaengine: Add support for MEMCPY for imx-dma. >> > [PATCH 2/4] i.MX DMA: Add support for 2D transfers. >> > [PATCH 3/4] dmaengine: i.MX: Add support for interleaved transfers. >> > [PATCH 4/4] dmaengine: Add support for multiple descriptors for imx-dma. >> >> Hi, >> what do you think of this series? >> >> Vinod: your concern about patch 1 is solved in patch 4 >> Sascha: I know you are not comfortable with patch 2 since it adds code >> to a file which is meant to be removed. However, is there a chance you >> accept it without me having to rewrite the whole series? > Without 2, I think this patch set looks okay. Sascha have you tested > this series, if so please let me know, I can apply the rest. Please, note that if for whatever reason you don't apply patch 2 you must not apply patch 3 either. Because, as I stated, it depends completely on patch 2. Regards. -- Javier Martin Vista Silicon S.L. CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345 Avda de los Castros s/n 39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain +34 942 25 32 60 www.vista-silicon.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/