Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:21:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:21:24 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:9486 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:21:17 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 16:50:37 -0600 To: Joe deBlaquiere Cc: Werner Almesberger , ferret@phonewave.net, Alexander Viro , LA Walsh , lkml Subject: Re: Linus's include file strategy redux Message-ID: <20001216165037.K3199@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: <20001215152137.K599@almesberger.net> <20001215184644.R573@almesberger.net> <3A3A7F25.2050203@redhat.com> <20001215222707.T573@almesberger.net> <3A3AA21F.4060100@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A3AA21F.4060100@redhat.com>; from jadb@redhat.com on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 04:58:39PM -0600 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [Joe deBlaquiere] > might be a good newbie filter... but actually the best thing about it > is that the compiler people of the work might make generating a > proper cross-toolchain less difficult by one or two magnitudes... *WHAT*? How much less difficult could it possibly get? This is the kernel, there is no cross-libc to worry about, so a cross-toolchain is already down to a pair of CMMIs[1]. I do agree that anyone who can't do *that* should probably be using a distro-packaged kernel.... Peter [1] configure-make-make-install - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/