Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965979Ab2B1ShQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:37:16 -0500 Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([140.211.166.183]:46825 "EHLO smtp.gentoo.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965107Ab2B1ShO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:37:14 -0500 From: Mike Frysinger Organization: wh0rd.org To: Grant Grundler Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] parisc: dont unconditionally override CROSS_COMPILE for 64 bit. Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:37:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0; KDE/4.6.5; x86_64; ; ) Cc: John David Anglin , James Bottomley , Paul Gortmaker , "kyle@mcmartin.ca" , "deller@gmx.de" , "linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" References: <1330298813-17262-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4F4CF3CF.5090605@bell.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1979808.xE6xXEOG8i"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202281337.14094.vapier@gentoo.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2858 Lines: 75 --nextPart1979808.xE6xXEOG8i Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tuesday 28 February 2012 13:22:50 Grant Grundler wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:33 AM, John David Anglin wrote: > > On 2/28/2012 10:21 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> we've been using hppa2.0 for years. gnuconfig certainly recognizes it: > >> $ grep hppa /usr/share/gnuconfig/config.**sub > >>=20 > >> | h8300 | h8500 | hppa | hppa1.[01] | hppa2.0 | hppa2.0[nw] | > >>=20 > >> hppa64 \ > >>=20 > >> | hppa-* | hppa1.[01]-* | hppa2.0-* | hppa2.0[nw]-* | hppa64-*= \ > >>=20 > >> and i've seen diff projects key off of the hppa2.0* to enable newer > >> features by > >> default. > >=20 > > Some of the above are specific to HP-UX, but hppa1.1, hppa2.0, hppa and > > hppa64 are > > valid for Linux based on config.guess. >=20 > Mike, et al, > I'd suggest NOT using hppa2.0 as a surrogate for 64-bit build. I'd prefer > hppa64 if 64-bit is meant. >=20 > hppa2.0 can also mean PA2.0 compliant binary compiled using ILP32 model. > right? i don't think that's what the proposed change does. James' patch runs $(CC= )=20 to find the active tuple, then replaces the first part with "hppa64" to get= a=20 64bit toolchain automatically. but that magic only works when the tuple is= =20 "hppa-xxx" and so will fail when the system is using "hppa2.0-xxx". short story: the proposed change will additionally support turning "hppa2.0- linux-gnu" into "hppa64-linux-gnu" rather than the existing "only turns hpp= a- linux-gnu" into "hppa64-linux-gnu". =2Dmike --nextPart1979808.xE6xXEOG8i Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJPTR7ZAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBuXkP/0q95mFhnAbLaazZUGDiQP6r 2CtwhKJsC9795qEyYd7onQsiTN0DJprihiI1BV/xdKBCOateoWfrCjgvbt3HupOB DaMV8l/bXys6dlgGIe7QrbOod+wDk2RLmkUi5eFa2WM8mwSO/FieX1iHOk4rc017 UKecJJwZSdfKTkzWgk4ocLAfswtXjloj7zj4dw58Fn+BzwaAXXr33tYHKBVqLS9J BF/vJMOduqK4sB3YEc+aJB0ZikNHYyfeK4LTrYcO2xXYAIKxSciV3vIW/QEsmOXv RlR/BxhBDbkNUrH4hndMBoDlf5TP7yJFNMsi3IkifVAcgyhNFsuKtZ5sppCb5yHj xENWX7pSLeQv3QrmXPe3SMiX0gb30lMtH5aPxcOzfnNaB7526OD+hx0zMdnu0+0J iRMAnjNrfsawjpUx607AwMiOzgPEC31xWXrD8XBx44R8yx/r+a4uzPWsw4kSo4ju OBqYlggdQSapjxkVMvWy3WmGlMJJmga1ZUIw4kNWQnenZavQElvRz/LMmaL/Eobe fzWJ2cQhRL2rkXQ1dt2EEsQLcQpEBkXdBxfWp9hNRtaehQxl6CDSSOyfURWns+yv KsbkTg7CKZNyU5hhLOyxwFGzlsakn5f/Qm2e3BpRvT88Nv2x+F1mobQOIALIP7/u WnOW3Jl+FpJAk6tSZJ/d =Lto8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1979808.xE6xXEOG8i-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/