Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756116Ab2B2I4Q (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:56:16 -0500 Received: from mail.southpole.se ([193.12.106.18]:45919 "EHLO mail.southpole.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753092Ab2B2I4O (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:56:14 -0500 Message-ID: <1330505774.2964.31.camel@crucifix> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] OpenRISC: IRQ: Include module.h From: Jonas Bonn To: Richard Weinberger Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux@openrisc.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:56:14 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4F4DE438.6050707@nod.at> References: <1330476393-14264-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1330476393-14264-2-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> <1330501749.2964.4.camel@crucifix> <4F4DE438.6050707@nod.at> Organization: South Pole AB Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Assp-Version: 2.1.1(11364) on assp.southpole.se X-Assp-Client-SSL: yes X-Assp-ID: assp.southpole.se 05773-08444 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1452 Lines: 41 On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 09:39 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Am 29.02.2012 08:49, schrieb Jonas Bonn: > You are right. export.h is better. > I forgot commit f501693 (module.h: split out the EXPORT_SYMBOL into export.h). > > > Thanks for helping out with build-testing the OpenRISC arch... much > > appreciated. > > I'm doing more than build-testing. > Yesterday my FPGA board booted the very first time Linux on OpenRISC. :-) > > Thanks, > //richard > Ah, awesome! Glad to hear that. I'll just let you in on the little catch with the upstream OpenRISC kernel, then: it drops support for deprecated syscalls; unfortunately, there is no libc that supports that yet. For that reason, the kernel at git://openrisc.net/jonas/linux is still the one that is most usable... it's carrying a patch to reenable those syscalls so that uClibc works. I've got a patch series that attempts to fix that, but upstream uClibc didn't seem particularly enamored by the idea of adding more code to libc so that Linux can get smaller... and that's kind of where we got stuck. Probably best to drop linux-kernel from this conversation at this point, but feel free to continue it at linux@lists.openrisc.net /Jonas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/