Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:23:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:23:54 -0400 Received: from gherkin.frus.com ([192.158.254.49]:13958 "HELO gherkin.frus.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:23:53 -0400 Message-Id: From: rct@gherkin.frus.com (Bob_Tracy) Subject: Re: PROBLEM: kernel BUG at page_alloc.c:117! In-Reply-To: <20020807143152.GA5991@louise.pinerecords.com> "from Tomas Szepe at Aug 7, 2002 04:31:52 pm" To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 14:27:32 -0500 (CDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2370 Lines: 49 Tomas Szepe wrote: > > Please report this to Nvidia. The linux community does not support or > > care about bugs reported on any boot when their binary only modules have > > been loaded > > And in case you're wondering whether lkml people are being assholes about > binary-only drivers and don't really want to help, note that this particular > bug has been confirmed many times to indeed be caused by the Nvidia module. Worse... When we outcast NVidia users trot over to the linux forum on the NVidia website, the attitude of the fellow that responds to darned near every posting might best be summarized as: "The 2.5.X series is for kernel developers. If you fancy yourself a kernel developer, you can fix the OS interface routines yourself." It's not clear from the limited amount of time I spend in that forum whether that poster is an NVidia employee, but if so... FEH!!! I supposed it *might* be possible that the source code NVidia *does* provide can be patched to workaround the braindamage that lurks within the binary-only module. Circumstantial evidence suggests the contrary, or it would have already been done. Enough has changed within the 2.5.X memory management code that I'm reasonably certain the NVidia driver problems will require modifications to code we *don't* have source for. Consider this an invitation for any NVidia employee "in the know" (who also reads this list) to comment. Even a hearty "f*ck off" would beat the world-class lettin' alone the linux community is currently getting. Linux zealots who insist I should vote with my dollars are cordially invited to suggest alternative video cards that (1) are fully supported under Linux, and (2) perform as well as the NVidia cards do (when the NVidia driver doesn't crash my system, that is). I have two informal benchmarks I care about: the OpenGL "lament" screensaver, and Unreal Tournament. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Tracy WTO + WIPO = DMCA? http://www.anti-dmca.org rct@frus.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/