Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 14:59:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 14:59:15 -0400 Received: from phoenix.mvhi.com ([195.224.96.167]:47375 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 14:59:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 20:02:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Julliard Subject: Re: [patch] tls-2.5.30-A1 Message-ID: <20020807200251.A13605@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Julliard References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from mingo@elte.hu on Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 08:10:40PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 791 Lines: 24 On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 08:10:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > the attached patch (against BK-curr + Luca Barbieri's two TLS patches) > does two things: > > - it implements a second TLS entry for Wine's purposes. The sys_set_thread_area interface gets worse with every patch you post.. Why do you really need a magic multiplexer syscall (you could have just used prctl if you don't need a sane interface..)? What about a proper interface like: asmlinkage int sys_set_thread_area(int entry, unsigned long base, int writeable) instead? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/