Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:56:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:56:19 -0500 Received: from wire.cadcamlab.org ([156.26.20.181]:14862 "EHLO wire.cadcamlab.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 18:56:03 -0500 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 17:25:18 -0600 To: infernix Cc: Niels Kristian Bech Jensen , "Linux kernel developer's mailing list" Subject: Re: Unable to boot 2.4.0-test12 (0224 AX:0212 BX:BC00 CX:5101 DX:000.) Message-ID: <20001216172518.M3199@cadcamlab.org> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from infernix@infernix.nl on Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 04:56:07PM +0100 From: Peter Samuelson Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [infernix] > I found the cause. I read somewhere in a debian bugreport that > bootsect.S can't handle really big (b)vmlinuz images (over 500kb > orso). However, I am wondering why 'make bzdisk' doesn't give me an > error or a warning. As someone (Jeff Garzik?) was saying a week or two ago, can we please kill the x86 boot sector already? With today's kernels, 'over 500k or so' is probably the common case. Is there *anything* the builtin code can do better than syslinux? Peter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/