Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:28:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:28:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:60642 "HELO mx1.elte.hu") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 15:28:54 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 21:31:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Ingo Molnar Reply-To: Ingo Molnar To: Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexandre Julliard , Luca Barbieri Subject: Re: [patch] tls-2.5.30-A1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1071 Lines: 25 On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > I would suggest: > - move all kernel-related (and thus non-visible to user space) segments > up, and make the cacheline optimizations _there_. > - keep the TLS entries contiguous, and make sure that segment 0040 (ie > GDT entry #8) is available to a TLS entry, since if I remember > correctly, that one is also magical for old Windows binaries for all > the wrong reasons (ie it was some system data area in DOS and in > Windows 3.1) > - and for cleanliness bonus points: make the regular user data segments > just another TLS segment that just happens to have default values. If > the user wants to screw with its own segments, let it. i'll do this. Julliard, any additional suggestions perhaps - is GDT entry 8 the best %fs choice for Wine? Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/