Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758243Ab2EAQIN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 12:08:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18777 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757362Ab2EAQIL (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 12:08:11 -0400 Message-ID: <4FA002F4.8000508@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 18:36:20 +0300 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Zijlstra CC: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" , mingo@elte.hu, jeremy@goop.org, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/5] KVM: Add paravirt kvm_flush_tlb_others References: <20120427161727.27082.43096.stgit@abhimanyu> <20120427162401.27082.59387.stgit@abhimanyu> <4F9D32B4.8040002@redhat.com> <1335865176.13683.120.camel@twins> <4F9FBF38.2060903@redhat.com> <1335869827.13683.133.camel@twins> <4F9FD337.5010908@redhat.com> <1335885292.13683.150.camel@twins> In-Reply-To: <1335885292.13683.150.camel@twins> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1382 Lines: 37 On 05/01/2012 06:14 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2012-05-01 at 15:12 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > > What's changed is not gup_fast() but the performance of munmap(), > > exit(), and exec(), no? > > If it is indeed cache related like you suggested earlier, it would be > the allocation side of things, like fork()/mmap() that suffer since > there's fewer hot pages about, but yes, anything creating/destroying > page-tables. Right. > > > What bounds the amount of memory waiting to be freed during an rcu grace > > period? > > Most RCU implementations don't have limits, so that could be quite a > lot. I think preemptible RCU has a batch limit at which point it tries > rather hard to force a grace period, but I'm not sure if even that > provides a hard limit. > > Practically though, I haven't had reports of PPC/Sparc going funny > because of this. It could be considered a DoS if a user is able to free page tables faster than rcu is able to recycle them, possibly triggering the oom killer (should that force a grace period before firing from the hip?) -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/