Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758340Ab2EARkN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 13:40:13 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:33349 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758209Ab2EARkL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 May 2012 13:40:11 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120430112907.14137.18910.stgit@zurg> References: <20120430112903.14137.81692.stgit@zurg> <20120430112907.14137.18910.stgit@zurg> From: KOSAKI Motohiro Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 13:39:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] proc/smaps: show amount of nonlinear ptes in vma To: Konstantin Khlebnikov Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2123 Lines: 49 On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:29 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote: > Currently, nonlinear mappings can not be distinguished from ordinary mappings. > This patch adds into /proc/pid/smaps line "Nonlinear: kB", where size is > amount of nonlinear ptes in vma, this line appears only if VM_NONLINEAR is set. > This information may be useful not only for checkpoint/restore project. > > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov > Requested-by: Pavel Emelyanov > --- > ?fs/proc/task_mmu.c | ? 12 ++++++++++++ > ?1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c > index acee5fd..b1d9729 100644 > --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c > +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c > @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ struct mem_size_stats { > ? ? ? ?unsigned long anonymous; > ? ? ? ?unsigned long anonymous_thp; > ? ? ? ?unsigned long swap; > + ? ? ? unsigned long nonlinear; > ? ? ? ?u64 pss; > ?}; > > @@ -402,6 +403,7 @@ static void smaps_pte_entry(pte_t ptent, unsigned long addr, > ?{ > ? ? ? ?struct mem_size_stats *mss = walk->private; > ? ? ? ?struct vm_area_struct *vma = mss->vma; > + ? ? ? pgoff_t pgoff = linear_page_index(vma, addr); > ? ? ? ?struct page *page = NULL; > ? ? ? ?int mapcount; > > @@ -414,6 +416,9 @@ static void smaps_pte_entry(pte_t ptent, unsigned long addr, > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?mss->swap += ptent_size; > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?else if (is_migration_entry(swpent)) > ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?page = migration_entry_to_page(swpent); > + ? ? ? } else if (pte_file(ptent)) { > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? if (pte_to_pgoff(ptent) != pgoff) > + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? mss->nonlinear += ptent_size; I think this is not equal to our non linear mapping definition. Even if pgoff is equal to linear mapping case, it is non linear. I.e. nonlinear is vma attribute. Why do you want to introduce different definition? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/