Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:16:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:16:10 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:12553 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:16:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:19:21 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Jesse Barnes cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, , , Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30 In-Reply-To: <20020807221532.GA20469@sgi.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 792 Lines: 25 On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, Aug 07, 2002 at 06:21:07PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > > On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > macro worked before? I could just remove all those checks in the scsi > > > code I guess. > > > > That would be a better option. > > Does this look a little better? Thanks for checking it out. Looks good to me. Would be even better if you removed MUST_NOT_HOLD ;) regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/