Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:47:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:47:20 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:37650 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 18:47:18 -0400 Message-ID: <3D51A3C9.8CAABAA4@zip.com.au> Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2002 15:48:41 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-rc3 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Daniel Phillips CC: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wli@holomorphy.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rmap speedup References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 862 Lines: 23 Daniel Phillips wrote: > > .. > > Not to mention the superfluous IO being scheduled today. > > Yes, well at this point we're suppose to demonstrate how much better > rmap does on that, are we not. Well let it be said that the 2.5.30 VM is by no means "Rik's rmap VM". It's the 2.4.15 VM with pte-chains bolted on the side, and it's fairly sucky in several regards. Until the big stuff is settled in (locking rework, per-zone LRU, slablru, ...) there's not a lot of point trying to finetune the 2.5.30 VM. But a convincing demonstration of the advantages of the 2.4 rmap patch would set a lot of minds at ease ;) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/