Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:20:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:20:26 -0400 Received: from tmr-02.dsl.thebiz.net ([216.238.38.204]:47632 "EHLO gatekeeper.tmr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:20:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 19:04:24 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Davidsen To: Petr Vandrovec cc: "Adam J. Richter" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nick.orlov@mail.ru Subject: Re: [PATCH] pdc20265 problem. In-Reply-To: <1528932608D@vcnet.vc.cvut.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2123 Lines: 47 On Wed, 7 Aug 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote: > On 7 Aug 02 at 0:54, Adam J. Richter wrote: > > Linux users in the "I'm not a sysadmin" crowd (?) probably > > don't care about the scan order of the pdc20265 IDE controller, > > but people in the "I'm a sysadmin, not a programmer" crowd > > may have legitimiate reasons to. > > But such "I'm not a sysadmin" people will be very surprised that their > promise was IDE2 in 2.2.x, it was IDE2 in 2.4.18, it is IDE2 in 2.5.30, > and now - oops - it is IDE0 in 2.4.19. Broken, I'd say. And on that one I really do agree. A change like that in 2.5 wouldn't bother me beyond usual ten minutes of consigning whoever did it to the darkest level of hell ;-) I would think that distributions would ship with a kernel which follows Plauger's "law of least astonishment," so it may not matter unless you roll your own. Kind of violates the idea of "stable" IMHO, but I have other design decisions which bother me far more. > There is an CONFIG_BLK_DEV_OFFBOARD option (apparently unused...), > so use this one, if some distribution must force ide0= to promise > if their installer cannot find master disk on /dev/hde. But changing > behavior for no reason - especially in the middle of stable series - > is IMHO unacceptable. I disagree with "no reason," there was a reason, but I do think it was a bad idea. There just aren't that many people with an onboard controller to justify a change. My opinion, of course. > Fortunately I use 2.5.30's IDE for real work ;-) I use 2.5 kernels to test my backups :-( The last one I ran drooled spillage in every attached drive, including my BSD drive which is on an offboard controller. I would tell you the version, but it gone. Somewhere in the 2.5.24..27 range. -- bill davidsen CTO, TMR Associates, Inc Doing interesting things with little computers since 1979. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/