Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754125Ab2EBNdZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2012 09:33:25 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.171]:49679 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753420Ab2EBNdY (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 May 2012 09:33:24 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann Organization: Linaro Limited To: Mike Turquette Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: Use a separate struct for holding init data. Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 13:32:44 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.4.0-rc3; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Mark Brown , Saravana Kannan , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Andrew Lunn , Grant Likely , h@pengutronix.de, Jamie Iles , Jeremy Kerr , Magnus Damm , Deepak Saxena , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring , Russell King , Thomas Gleixner , Richard Zhao , Shawn Guo , Paul Walmsley , Linus Walleij , Stephen Boyd , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria References: <4d67387a86d99cbb4e2acf68d3588b1c.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> <20120501181922.GD4089@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120502015650.GE17311@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120502015650.GE17311@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205021332.44699.arnd.bergmann@linaro.org> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:zb6UXa3kLAbNZIi08hL7x+7pkgGSw3RFg7Cv6+IbEix JV2W05hIMK3h83cN6v9851ot0w3FNC62pRap6xbASoSN7QqS9s SAbXq77MTXASN4pMK0In7BIWVA1wLgCsKZE4PGkq5yKG1u+ycq 5wwSZ5ArDusj1cOuu4gOz3rR6Gkw5mSOEz/+iyVxay9av/shnO 43fKn+IwzUsIbpytarwBzixahFWEIHAMyISu2oQIgDt6cDxhem NJt+P3y3CGOu6O1LFiqmfOjF2rPWT9dV31iF920zkfdBEF1yI1 XkpliliKUJ+W2+LdH3aHpWevu7i8lfuHnyE8OGI3h5NEenGEl7 4xQ1u8MkilVcZyPtmsQDrfl5WrxeqiKufHSXBDG1k Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 747 Lines: 18 On Wednesday 02 May 2012, Mike Turquette wrote: > I was happy to push my changes to Linus directly (as discussed in > previous mails) but I'm starting to think that maybe having Arnd absorb > the clk-next branch as part of arm-soc would be the fastest way to > assist platforms that are porting over. > > Do the platform folks agree? Is this suggestion sane? I guess that makes sense while there are still nontrivial interdependencies between work going the clk-next branch and into arm-soc. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/