Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754004Ab2ECMWv (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 08:22:51 -0400 Received: from mail-pz0-f46.google.com ([209.85.210.46]:52935 "EHLO mail-pz0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753323Ab2ECMWt (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 May 2012 08:22:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 21:22:44 +0900 From: Takuya Yoshikawa To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: make callers check lock contention for cond_resched_lock() Message-Id: <20120503212244.6abbfa8bc3f46a7f7a932bb7@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <1336034127.13683.197.camel@twins> References: <20120503171244.2debdd80931ccf35f387c5fe@gmail.com> <1336034127.13683.197.camel@twins> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.2.0beta3 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1270 Lines: 31 On Thu, 03 May 2012 10:35:27 +0200 Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 17:12 +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote: > > > > Although we can do that using spin_is_contended() and cond_resched(), > > changing cond_resched_lock() to satisfy such a need is another option. > > > Yeah, not a pretty patch. Changing all cond_resched_lock() sites just to > change one and in such an ugly way too. > > So what's the impact of making spin_needbreak() work for !PREEMPT? Although the real use case is out of this RFC patch, we are now discussing a case in which we may hold a spin_lock for long time, ms order, depending on workload; and in that case, other threads -- VCPU threads -- should be given higher priority for that problematic lock. I wanted to hear whether other users also have similar needs. If so, it may be worth making the API a bit more generic. But I could not find a clean solution for that. Do you think that using spin_is_contended() directly is the way to go? Thanks, Takuya -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/