Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:51:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:51:21 -0400 Received: from e21.nc.us.ibm.com ([32.97.136.227]:27590 "EHLO e21.nc.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:51:21 -0400 Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 07:51:53 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" To: Ingo Oeser , Andrew Morton cc: Anton Blanchard , William Lee Irwin III , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@surriel.com Subject: Re: fix CONFIG_HIGHPTE Message-ID: <1417118248.1028793099@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <20020807204332.B5777@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> References: <20020807204332.B5777@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.1.2 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 20 >> - We'll continue to suck for the University workload. > > Hop that's not an 2.6 option, because our University alone is > using Linux on 1000+ machines, on 500+ private machines and lots > of mission critical servers. > > If Linux becomes crap for the CPU-Server-Load, we would be VERY > sorry here, since we are pushing it very hard[1]. It'd be helpful if you benchmarked whatever workload you have comparing 2.4 and 2.5 mainline then ;-) If it sucks, post some profiling data, and carefully describe what your workload is. M. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/