Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759383Ab2EDS6v (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 14:58:51 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:52245 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753876Ab2EDS6t (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 14:58:49 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: Making ARM multiplatform kernels DT-only? Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 16:24:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/3.4.0-rc3; KDE/4.3.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Sascha Hauer , Kukjin Kim , linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, Jason Cooper , Nicolas Pitre , Tony Lindgren , Nicolas Ferre , Linus Walleij , Magnus Damm , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Haojian Zhuang , Deepak Saxena , Olof Johansson , "Russell King - ARM Linux" , David Brown , shawn.guo@linaro.org, "Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" References: <201205031350.35476.arnd@arndb.de> <20120503144609.GK4141@pengutronix.de> In-Reply-To: <20120503144609.GK4141@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201205041624.17850.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:XpsugXqj/Qp/2cjB2DsIHofLDGCDh9VHPBL/6yAHPyH sk/b/tv+s3/JpWf2SEVKh9LGEwhirwrKj1gMNcgY6Rp/xDuwyA El2ZR+GmY0vqG3WY7qRO45Qj8y7R2OvqF+93rGSscXBOvPrvYt jHnr3dLma8u4+B+PYAfzzjqZqK1eZJb1hEJut2iEzIKB6Nsl4Y ueFV9U7bJ2qvH/k106C4QQMalya3apHnYxmAWUiLSQWtMvqSEn oxwETLSQ+MTDGJ2Bq+xjtu+I/4RlapHvPe6lhGH52PM6pohsKz 4MwKlGFe8ickXPscihPLUtmdjXQI1eE5UYZyG/ZGPURQucXcZ+ 9v+e92dOkphPaxOBfXJ4= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1205 Lines: 25 On Thursday 03 May 2012, Sascha Hauer wrote: > I don't think that enforcing DT only in multiplatform kernels will speed > up porting to DT. As a platform maintainer I am interested in building > multiplatform Kernels, but our customers are mostly uninterested in > this. They probably disable other platforms anyway to save the binary space. I was not asking about enabling multiple board files but multiple mach-* directories, which is something that I'm probably more interested in than you are, and the customers you refer to would certainly not do that if they only want to run on one board. This is really about people who distribute kernels that run on a wide variety of machines across soc vendor boundaries, people like ubuntu or cyanogenmod. The question is really whether you see a reason why they should enable the 25 non-DT board files on your platform, rather than helping out getting DT support for the machines they are interested in? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/