Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932232Ab2EDUpR (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 4 May 2012 16:45:17 -0400
Received: from mail-pb0-f46.google.com ([209.85.160.46]:44823 "EHLO
	mail-pb0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1759936Ab2EDUpJ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 4 May 2012 16:45:09 -0400
Message-Id: <20120504204225.747234274@linuxfoundation.org>
User-Agent: quilt/0.60-19.1
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 13:42:40 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, "he, bo" <bo.he@intel.com>,
        "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>,
        "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [ 16/75] sched: Fix OOPS when build_sched_domains() percpu allocation fails
In-Reply-To: <20120504204258.GA12552@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2706
Lines: 87

3.3-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "he, bo" <bo.he@intel.com>

commit fb2cf2c660971bea0ad86a9a5c19ad39eab61344 upstream.

Under extreme memory used up situations, percpu allocation
might fail. We hit it when system goes to suspend-to-ram,
causing a kworker panic:

 EIP: [<c124411a>] build_sched_domains+0x23a/0xad0
 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception
 Pid: 3026, comm: kworker/u:3
 3.0.8-137473-gf42fbef #1

 Call Trace:
  [<c18cc4f2>] panic+0x66/0x16c
  [...]
  [<c1244c37>] partition_sched_domains+0x287/0x4b0
  [<c12a77be>] cpuset_update_active_cpus+0x1fe/0x210
  [<c123712d>] cpuset_cpu_inactive+0x1d/0x30
  [...]

With this fix applied build_sched_domains() will return -ENOMEM and
the suspend attempt fails.

Signed-off-by: he, bo <bo.he@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1335355161.5892.17.camel@hebo
[ So, we fail to deallocate a CPU because we cannot allocate RAM :-/
  I don't like that kind of sad behavior but nevertheless it should
  not crash under high memory load. ]
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/sched/core.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6334,16 +6334,26 @@ static void __sdt_free(const struct cpum
 		struct sd_data *sdd = &tl->data;
 
 		for_each_cpu(j, cpu_map) {
-			struct sched_domain *sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j);
-			if (sd && (sd->flags & SD_OVERLAP))
-				free_sched_groups(sd->groups, 0);
-			kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j));
-			kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j));
-			kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgp, j));
+			struct sched_domain *sd;
+
+			if (sdd->sd) {
+				sd = *per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j);
+				if (sd && (sd->flags & SD_OVERLAP))
+					free_sched_groups(sd->groups, 0);
+				kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sd, j));
+			}
+
+			if (sdd->sg)
+				kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sg, j));
+			if (sdd->sgp)
+				kfree(*per_cpu_ptr(sdd->sgp, j));
 		}
 		free_percpu(sdd->sd);
+		sdd->sd = NULL;
 		free_percpu(sdd->sg);
+		sdd->sg = NULL;
 		free_percpu(sdd->sgp);
+		sdd->sgp = NULL;
 	}
 }
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/