Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760651Ab2EDXUi (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 19:20:38 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:43034 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757894Ab2EDXUh (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 19:20:37 -0400 From: Michael Neuling To: Diwakar Tundlam cc: "'Peter Zijlstra'" , "'Ingo Molnar'" , "'Andrew Morton'" , "'Christoph Lameter'" , "'Stephen Rothwell'" , "'Benjamin Herrenschmidt'" , "'David Rientjes'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , Peter De Schrijver Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Enable arch-specific asym packing option in sched domain In-reply-to: <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE46652379C3DF103@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> References: <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE46652379C3DF0FF@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE46652379C3DF101@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> <1336169422.16236.1.camel@twins> <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE46652379C3DF102@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> <1336170586.16236.11.camel@twins> <1DD7BFEDD3147247B1355BEFEFE46652379C3DF103@HQMAIL04.nvidia.com> Comments: In-reply-to Diwakar Tundlam message dated "Fri, 04 May 2012 16:18:08 -0700." X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 23.3.1 Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 09:20:34 +1000 Message-ID: <19500.1336173634@neuling.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2598 Lines: 56 > Thanks for clarifying the Power7. I see the point - package vs cpu's within a package. > > Yes, this is for Nvidia's ARM Quad-core Tegra CPU. It is a single > package, organized flatly. To save power, we want cores to be loaded > up in order from cpu0, 1, etc. The ASYM_PACKING flag seems to do > exactly what we need if set in the domain flag. Arrh, so it's not a performance issue but power savings.. that would this asymmetric packing a lot more appropriate to use. Mikey > > Thanks, > --Diwakar. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl] > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2012 3:30 PM > To: Diwakar Tundlam > Cc: 'Ingo Molnar'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'Christoph Lameter'; 'Michael Neuling'; 'Stephen Rothwell'; 'Benjamin Herrenschmidt'; 'David Rientjes'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'; Peter De Schrijver > Subject: RE: [PATCH] sched: Enable arch-specific asym packing option in sched domain > > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 15:18 -0700, Diwakar Tundlam wrote: > > > > arch_sd_sibling_asym_packing() is already present under ifdef CONFIG_SMT. > > I didn't touch that. I only added it to SD_CPU_INIT for all cpu's. > > I assumed Power7 shouldn't use SD_CPU_INIT. > > All archs use SD_CPU_INIT, its the default topology level for a package/socket. So now you've made Power7 prefer lower numbered sockets over higher numbered sockets.. not fatal, but not really nice either. > > [ power7 is the only one that implements arch_sd_sibling_asym_packing ] > > > Maybe I should define a separate weak symbol, say arch_sd_bias_to_lower_num_cpu()? > > Then Power7 can define arch_sd_sibling_asym_packing() to be '1' and it > > will not break all-cpu init. > > A slightly saner name would be: > > arch_sd_package_asym_packing() > > FWIW, I suspect you're wanting to use this for some ARM chip (nvidia doesn't do much else -- aside from this graphics stuff) so that if there's hardly anything it runs on cpu0. Now, last time I checked, these ARM things had only 1 package, so I still don't see the point :-) > > I suspect you want to modify SD_MC_INIT() with something like: > > arch_sd_mc_asym_packing() > > Or is this the big-little thing and you're representing them as separate packages? > > See how a little extra information avoids me having to endlessly second guess wtf you're actually wanting to do? > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/