Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757346Ab2EEA6S (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 20:58:18 -0400 Received: from mail-gh0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:33624 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754581Ab2EEA6R (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 May 2012 20:58:17 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1336152428-24242-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <1336153306.23481.33.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com> Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 17:58:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] do not use s_dirt in JFFS2 From: Brian Norris To: dedekind1@gmail.com Cc: MTD Maling List , David Woodhouse , Linux Kernel Maling List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 929 Lines: 21 On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Brian Norris wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >> On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 20:27 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: >>> This patch-set makes JFFS2 file-system stop using the VFS '->write_supers()' >>> call-back because I plan to remove it once all users are gone. >> >> I'd really appreciate if someone on the MTD list tested these patches. > > Am I crazy, or did you send the cover letter without the patches? Sorry, I am at least a little crazy: I actually see two patches (labelled 1/2 and 2/2) while the cover is labelled 0/3, with a diffstat from FAT changes... Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/