Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:37:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:36:23 -0400 Received: from zok.SGI.COM ([204.94.215.101]:24274 "EHLO zok.sgi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 13:35:58 -0400 Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2002 10:39:33 -0700 From: Jesse Barnes To: Rik van Riel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmacd@namesys.com, phillips@arcor.de, rml@tech9.net Subject: Re: [PATCH] lock assertion macros for 2.5.30 Message-ID: <20020808173933.GA29474@sgi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Rik van Riel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmacd@namesys.com, phillips@arcor.de, rml@tech9.net References: <20020808172335.GA29509@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 709 Lines: 19 On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 02:36:46PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote: > Looks fine to me, but I'm not a SCSI guy so you'll have to > ask them about integrating the patch ;) Oh, I meant that I removed those changes _from my patch_. Now they're confined to x86 and ia64 header files and some generic files. I'm not sure who to send it to now (Linus?). > The other issues you raised are probably best done in > separate patches. Ok, thanks a lot for the feedback. Jesse - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/