Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:13:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:13:34 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:62981 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Aug 2002 16:13:33 -0400 Message-ID: <3D52D1C9.9070404@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2002 16:17:13 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rik van Riel CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Announce: daily 2.5 BK snapshots References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1595 Lines: 44 Rik van Riel wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > >>Since Linus does not do pre-patches anymore, he mentioned some time ago >>it would be nice if somebody created an automated BK snapshot process to >>make BK changes accessible between kernel releases. I've done that. >> >>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/snap/2.5/ > > >>Questions and comments welcome. > > > Heh, I've had something vaguely like this on NL.linux.org: > > ftp://ftp.nl.linux.org/pub/linux/bk2patch/ > > Every 3 hours it creates a unidiff between the latest > tagged version and the head of the bk tree, for both 2.5 > and 2.4. Just to forestall other private responses [already gotten two], mine is slightly different than your's, and David Woodhouse's setup. My goal was basically to create a daily pre-patch, complete with hacked EXTRAVERSION. That's something that is familiar to testers (pre-patch form), and the snapshot is not so often that people will get buried in a flurry of patches and csets. can you say "2.5.30-bk439" ;-) So I consider my dailies as a complement to your bk2patch and dwmw2's output, not redundant. Programmers would probably find dwmw2's per-cset patches to be more useful, while testers and power users, and maybe maintainers, would prefer daily pre-patches to test and sync against. Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/