Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S132303AbQLQEYo>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 23:24:44 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S132357AbQLQEYe>; Sat, 16 Dec 2000 23:24:34 -0500
Received: from anime.net ([63.172.78.150]:29701 "EHLO anime.net")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S132303AbQLQEYa>;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2000 23:24:30 -0500
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 19:54:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
To: <davej@suse.de>
cc: Rico Tudor <rico@patrec.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: ServerWorks docs?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012161956020.7396-100000@neo.local>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0012161951400.21856-100000@anime.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, 16 Dec 2000 davej@suse.de wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2000, Rico Tudor wrote:
> > Does anyone have reference material for the ServerWorks northbridge?
> > I want to add their chipsets to my ECC-monitoring utility, but their
> > web site is little more than marketing drivel.  Plus, they don't respond
> > to e-mail.
> I've tried on several occasions, but not got anywhere.
> Judging by the comments on the lm-sensors homepage, chances of them
> publically releasing register level info seems pretty slim.

serverworks requires you not only to sign an NDA, but also do all
development on-site at their santa clara HQ under their direct
supervision.

I think it's rather stupid to have to take several days off work to fly
down to their HQ just for code that will take maybe 5 minutes to write.

If someone in santa clara wants to do it, fine.

-Dan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/