Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 00:58:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 00:58:21 -0500 Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:47876 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 17 Dec 2000 00:58:15 -0500 From: "Albert D. Cahalan" Message-Id: <200012170527.eBH5Rbr441809@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Subject: Re: 2.2.18 signal.h To: meissner@spectacle-pond.org (Michael Meissner) Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 00:27:37 -0500 (EST) Cc: andrea@suse.de (Andrea Arcangeli), Franz.Sirl-kernel@lauterbach.com (Franz Sirl), root@chaos.analogic.com (Richard B. Johnson), mblack@csihq.com (Mike Black), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or) In-Reply-To: <20001215153130.B24830@munchkin.spectacle-pond.org> from "Michael Meissner" at Dec 15, 2000 03:31:30 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Michael Meissner writes: > On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 07:54:33PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:59:24PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote: >>> It's required by ISO C, and since that's the standard now, gcc >>> spits out a warning. Just adding a ; is enough and already >>> done for most stuff in 2.4.0-test12. ... >> Why am I required to put a `;' only in the last case and not in >> all the previous ones? Or maybe gcc-latest is forgetting to >> complain about the previous ones ;) > > Because neither > >