Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756833Ab2EHQlN (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 12:41:13 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57951 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755039Ab2EHQlJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 12:41:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4FA94C71.7000402@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 09:40:17 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andi Kleen CC: Alex Shi , mgorman@suse.de, npiggin@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, jeremy@goop.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, glommer@redhat.com, riel@redhat.com, luto@mit.edu, avi@redhat.com, len.brown@intel.com, dhowells@redhat.com, fenghua.yu@intel.com, borislav.petkov@amd.com, yinghai@kernel.org, cpw@sgi.com, steiner@sgi.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, penberg@kernel.org, hughd@google.com, rientjes@google.com, kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, trenn@suse.de, tj@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, axboe@kernel.dk, a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl, kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] x86/tlb: add tlb flush all factor for specific CPUs References: <1336485790-30902-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <1336485790-30902-5-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com> <4FA938AE.9070209@zytor.com> <4FA94239.2010503@linux.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <4FA94239.2010503@linux.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 905 Lines: 25 On 05/08/2012 08:56 AM, Andi Kleen wrote: > >> This seems a bit concerning from a forward compatibility point of view. >> It would make more sense to assume that future processors would behave >> more like the most recent (Sandy Bridge in your case) unless there is >> evidence to the contrary. > This would not work on new Atoms, which inter mix model numbers. > That is another problem, but there isn't much we (as the Linux community) can do about that, so we can just do the optimistic thing... > In the past I did a hack in other software to check the cache sizes to > distinguish the two > for unknown models It's not pretty however. Ick. -hpa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/