Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755923Ab2EHVKk (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 17:10:40 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:46258 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755505Ab2EHVKj (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 May 2012 17:10:39 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: a75D59snfokuU5y3hQNHJgtrKAzKPSMsM6FunNKaAWt+ 1336511438 Message-ID: <4FA98BCC.1020404@fastmail.fm> Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 22:10:36 +0100 From: Jack Stone User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: wilson self CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gilad@benyossef.com, fweisbec@gmail.com Subject: Re: Work queues and cpu isolation References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 989 Lines: 23 [Adding CCs] On 05/08/2012 10:03 PM, wilson self wrote: > I have done some reading on the subject of work queues and CPU > isolation, and specifically I've read a number of posts from Max K. > dating back to 2008 on the subject of CPU isolation. However, I have > not seen much in the way of discussion on the subject in more recent > times, specifically in the 3.x kernels; where it appears there are > some significant differences in the structure of workqueue in general. > > Is there anyone currently doing work on additional isolation of CPUs > from work queues? I have some requirement to further isolate cores on > a machine from these queues and am hoping someone here could point me > in the right direction. > > Thanks. > wilson -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/