Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 02:49:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 02:49:10 -0400 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:53517 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 9 Aug 2002 02:49:09 -0400 Message-ID: <3D53656F.9000004@evision.ag> Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 08:47:11 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki Reply-To: martin@dalecki.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; pl-PL; rv:1.1b) Gecko/20020722 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, pl, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: Petr Vandrovec , Nick Orlov , B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl, Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, davidsen@tmr.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] pdc20265 problem. References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 904 Lines: 18 Uz.ytkownik Andre Hedrick napisa?: > Clearly the difference between what is silkscreened and the usage intent > is beyond the obvious :-/ Since I have had or still have first hand > experience in the observed behaior under Linux and MicroSoft, you are > going by what is read. Book knowledges gets you books not reality. > try a few w/ all of them bootable and see what happens. So until Linux > gets a clue about EDDS 2.0 and or 3.0 it has not a chance of getting the > correct hd0/hd1 from the INT13/19 services. Obviously experience and > first hand knowledge of reality is worthless in Linux. I am out of this > thread. BTW. EDDS is up to level 3.3 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/