Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758635Ab2EIINQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 04:13:16 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:37594 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751176Ab2EIINM (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 May 2012 04:13:12 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 10:13:06 +0200 From: Sascha Hauer To: Christoph Fritz Cc: Sascha Hauer , Russell King , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Hans J. Koch" , Daniel Mack Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mx35: add cpufreq support Message-ID: <20120509081306.GK27341@pengutronix.de> References: <20120507141437.GA9636@lovely.krouter> <20120509072239.GG27341@pengutronix.de> <20120509075618.GA4412@lovely.krouter> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120509075618.GA4412@lovely.krouter> X-Sent-From: Pengutronix Hildesheim X-URL: http://www.pengutronix.de/ X-IRC: #ptxdist @freenode X-Accept-Language: de,en X-Accept-Content-Type: text/plain X-Uptime: 10:03:17 up 178 days, 15:50, 66 users, load average: 0.09, 0.13, 0.14 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:21e:67ff:fe11:9c5c X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: sha@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1574 Lines: 35 On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:56:18AM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote: > Hi Sascha, > > On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 09:22:39AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Christoph Fritz wrote: > > > This patch adds the mx35 to the supported cpu-families of the > > > "CPUfreq driver for i.MX CPUs". > > > > I'm afraid this has to wait another cycle since you are patching a file > > that is scheduled to be replaced with common clock framework support. > > Has this "scheduled replacement" somewhere (e.g. calendar) been > marked? So that I can check in the future before editing "scheduled > files". The clock framework conversion has been a hot topic for quite a while now, but there hasn't been an official note about it outside the list. I can understand that the occasional linux arm kernel reader is not aware of it, but we currently have nothing in place to anounce such things. (Other than feature-removal.txt which seems not very suitable since no feature is removed, only updated) Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/